The fresh new validity and you can reliability of questionnaire was basically checked out and you will fixed in line with the pre-shot

Towards the , this research selected a couple of categories inside the Chengdu Shishi secondary school and you may Jinniu secondary school correspondingly, distributed 300 surveys, recovered 278 surveys, subtracted several incorrect questionnaires and you may 266 legitimate questionnaires. New formal data is accomplished of .

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the sports leisure attitude scale with 16 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.87, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001), and three common factors could be extracted, and the corresponding Cronbach' ? coefficients were 0.84, 0.81, and 0.83 respectively. In addition, the overall scale ? coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.92, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.91, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, with good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three common factors (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the scale has good reliability and validity.

Canonical correlation analysis try an analytical approach familiar with decide to try brand new correlation training between you to catholic singles group of manage variables and something classification off standard parameters

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure motivation scale with 21 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.78, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 4 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.79–0.85, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.88; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.04 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the four dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure barriers scale with 17 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.85, Bartlett ball test p < 0.001). The scale could extract three common factors, corresponding to Cronbach’ ? coefficient is between 0.82–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.94, 0.90, 0.91, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.02 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure satisfaction scale with 25 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.82, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 6 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.81–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.84; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.93, 0.95, and 0.92 in order, which was all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the six dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Analytical Analytics

It is designed to discover maximum correlation amongst the linear consolidation regarding control details in addition to linear mixture of standards parameters. Thus, canonical correlation investigation testing the canonical relationship combination of several standard parameters and you may multiple control parameters, Canonical relationship investigation can create a combination of tall and unimportant canonical relationship. Fundamentally, it does deliver the following the basic guidance: you’re the common correlation coefficient can mirror the latest correlation training involving the linear mix of control parameters therefore the linear integration regarding standard variables. The typical correlation coefficient need visited a significant level in order to depict the main relationship between the two groups of linear combos. The second is new view coefficient (i.age., the fresh new square property value regular relationship coefficient R). It indicates your typical circumstances of one’s fundamental adjustable normally getting informed me of the typical items of the manage varying (no less than ten%). The next is the structural coefficient (normal weight). It’s meant to handle the fresh relationship between your adjustable and you may brand new criterion changeable on their particular typical linear combos. The absolute worth of the coefficient should be more than 0.30 to describe that their particular typical linear combos provides explanatory strength.